Re: postgresql 9.3 -> 9.4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Bardur Arantsson <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 01/29/2015 01:00 PM, Martti Kühne wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Martti Kühne <mysatyre@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> You could also write a pacman wrapper that interferes with pacman's
>>> execution upon specific output.
>
> (Doesn't scale to more than one user since nobody else is going to be
> using that script.)
>
>>> Then you could have loud warning signals, send emails that get you
>>> fired and an automatic backup to the NSA, or NAS, as you like.
>>>
>>
>>
>> To correct myself: It's silly to assume the package that breaks your
>> setup is already on that watchlist. There's only one thing you can do:
>> make sure you have the time to clean up after your update.
>>
>
> Uh, there's a difference between
>
>   a) We *know* that upgrade X will break your system and/or
>      require manual intervention.
>
> and
>
>   b) We have no specific knowledge that upgrade X will
>   break your system and/or require manual intervention.
>


So, my script doesn't scale and your notion of 'we' does?
How comes?

cheers!
mar77i


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux