On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Patrick Burroughs <celti@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I agree, and a message from pacman as I've multiply stated should be in > place seems perfectly sufficient notification to me — you DO read all > your messages from pacman, don't you? Please keep your passive aggressive personal attacks to yourself. I do not run PGSQL on Arch, I do not run Arch as a server and yes, I do read my pacman output. What *I* was doing was offering a fact-based contrary opinion based on lengthy experience and working in an Enterprise arena that deals with this subject matter directly on a large scale with several distributions. -te
