Re: Think twice before moving to systemd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



2012/8/22 Sebastian Günther <arch@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> * Felipe Contreras (felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx) [22.08.12 02:22]:
>> Funny that you say "around the same time", when it's clearly less than
>> 6 seconds, so it's 15% slower, but that's the second instance of kdm.
>> The first instance starts at 2s in 1000 hz, and 4s in 300 hz, so
>> there's *clearly* a big difference.
>
> So it's only needs twice the time with only on third of the ticks? Well
> that is awesome... Yeah to systemd!
>
> Anyway we are talking about 2 seconds...
> compared to time you wasted for a lot of people: It would have been
> better you had just saved all the delaying seconds for 100 boots and got
> a cup of coffee as normal users do when they boot their computer....
>
> Sebastian
>
> P.S.: sorry for feeding the trolls, but I simply could not resist...
>
> --
>  " Religion ist das Opium des Volkes. "  |   _   ASCII ribbon campaign
>                               Karl Marx  |  ( )   against HTML e-mail
>  SEB@STI@N GÜNTHER                       |   X   against M$ attachments
>                  mailto:arch@xxxxxxxxxx  |  / \   www.asciiribbon.org

Where is that time where computer could take up to thirty seconds to boot up ?

-- 

Cordialement, Coues Ludovic
06 148 743 42
--
()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux