On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:08 PM, John K Pate <j.k.pate@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:16:31 +0200 >> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto >>> <denisfalqueto@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> > This is so stupid that it's not even funny. You said that the problem >>> > was having CONFIG_HZ=300 and systemd. I said it is not, because I also >>> > have that situation and it works. So, your point is moot. I didn't say >>> > you don't have a problem, but just that it may be not related to >>> > CONFIG_HZ. I even sent you an article with ways on how to inspect the >>> > behaviour of systemd, which was completely ignored. >>> >>> My problem with CONFIG_HZ exists >>> independently of whether you experience the problem yourself or not. >> >> But it suggests that the problem is not *just* systemd and >> CONFIG_HZ=300. I am, and many others are, running systemd with >> CONFIG_HZ=300 fine. > > Show me two bootcharts, one with CONFIG_HZ_300=y, and another with > CONFIG_HZ_1000=y. Then I will believe that you are running systemd > fine. The other possibility is that you are just not noticing the > problem. Chalange accepted. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/9222479/bootchart-arch-hz300.png Bootchart of 20 seconds, with Arch stock kernel, CONFIG_HZ=300. You can see that kdm is started in around 7 seconds after boot starts. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/9222479/bootchart-ck-hz1000.png Same length chart, with CK patchset kernel, from AUR package (some problems compiling stock kernel with CONFIG_HZ=1000, not related to systemd at all0. You'll be amazed to see kdm starting at around the same time. Happy now? -- A: Because it obfuscates the reading. Q: Why is top posting so bad? For more information, please read: http://idallen.com/topposting.html ------------------------------------------- Denis A. Altoe Falqueto Linux user #524555 -------------------------------------------
