On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 3:39 AM, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 5:17 AM, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto > <denisfalqueto@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Felipe Contreras >> <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm sure in due time systemd will be ready, and will have nice >>> advantages, but I doubt that's the case right now. Has anybody looked >>> into the CONFIG_HZ issue? I doubt that. >> >> Arch's stock kernel: >> >> $ zgrep CONFIG_HZ /proc/config.gz >> # CONFIG_HZ_100 is not set >> # CONFIG_HZ_250 is not set >> CONFIG_HZ_300=y >> # CONFIG_HZ_1000 is not set >> CONFIG_HZ=300 >> >> Systemd is working fine enough. A counter example shoud invalidate >> your argument that CONFIG_HZ is the culprit. > > That doesn't prove anything, your machine is not my machine. And you dare to call for scientific process? Your arguments are general and your test universe is your machine? Oh, please. -- A: Because it obfuscates the reading. Q: Why is top posting so bad? For more information, please read: http://idallen.com/topposting.html ------------------------------------------- Denis A. Altoe Falqueto Linux user #524555 -------------------------------------------
