On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Ananda Samaddar <ananda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 21:53:04 -0400 > Loui Chang <louipc.ist@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Wed 30 Jun 2010 00:15 +0100, Ananda Samaddar wrote: >> > On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:56:39 -0500 >> > Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > > I was also waiting for someone more knowledgeable with regards to >> > > the wiki. >> > > >> > > If it's my say-so you want, I don't see a problem with adding >> > > *additional* content under CC. But switching all *existing* >> > > content to CC might be a problem. >> > >> > Not really, I'm wanting to adapt a Gentoo document to Arch's needs. >> > This document is CC by SA attribution licensed. The whole Wiki >> > article would have to be under the same license and not the GFDL. >> > The CC and GFDL licenses are not compatible. Would it be ok to add >> > a footer paragraph to the Wiki article stating that the WHOLE >> > article is CC licensed and to disregard the GFDL footer at the >> > bottom? This would only be for new Wiki articles. I am not >> > proposing re-licensing existing Wiki articles. >> >> Just do it. >> > > OK I will do. Anyone who objects to this should say so now. > > Ananda > http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/ArchWiki:General_disclaimer states: All text is under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License *unless otherwise stated within the document.* -- Des
