On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Ananda Samaddar <ananda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 23:19:09 +0200 >> Linas <linas_fi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> I assume this ask to have GFDL & CC-BY-SA content coexist at the >>> wiki. The existing content can only be relicensed by its authors. The >>> GFDL 1.3 gateway >>> expired on August 1, 2009. >>> >> >> I really need an answer on this as soon as possible. For new Wiki >> articles would it be OK to add a footer in the article stating that it >> is licensed under a CC license and not the GFDL? Any official word on >> this please from the Arch wiki admins or developers. If you're not >> willing to officially allow CC licenses could the 'override' paragraph >> I'm suggesting for new content only be all right? > > I honestly don't know who is going to reply to you. If you were to > just change the license I also don't think you'd have anyone come > after you anytime soon. > > Who is in charge of the wiki these days I'm not sure, but I'd try to > get someone's attention besides mine- maybe Pierre or Aaron would be > the right guys. I was also waiting for someone more knowledgeable with regards to the wiki. If it's my say-so you want, I don't see a problem with adding *additional* content under CC. But switching all *existing* content to CC might be a problem. Is this sufficient?
