On Wed 30 Jun 2010 00:15 +0100, Ananda Samaddar wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:56:39 -0500 > Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I was also waiting for someone more knowledgeable with regards to the > > wiki. > > > > If it's my say-so you want, I don't see a problem with adding > > *additional* content under CC. But switching all *existing* content to > > CC might be a problem. > > Not really, I'm wanting to adapt a Gentoo document to Arch's needs. > This document is CC by SA attribution licensed. The whole Wiki article > would have to be under the same license and not the GFDL. The CC and > GFDL licenses are not compatible. Would it be ok to add a footer > paragraph to the Wiki article stating that the WHOLE article is CC > licensed and to disregard the GFDL footer at the bottom? This would > only be for new Wiki articles. I am not proposing re-licensing existing > Wiki articles. Just do it.
