On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 21:53:04 -0400 Loui Chang <louipc.ist@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed 30 Jun 2010 00:15 +0100, Ananda Samaddar wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:56:39 -0500 > > Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I was also waiting for someone more knowledgeable with regards to > > > the wiki. > > > > > > If it's my say-so you want, I don't see a problem with adding > > > *additional* content under CC. But switching all *existing* > > > content to CC might be a problem. > > > > Not really, I'm wanting to adapt a Gentoo document to Arch's needs. > > This document is CC by SA attribution licensed. The whole Wiki > > article would have to be under the same license and not the GFDL. > > The CC and GFDL licenses are not compatible. Would it be ok to add > > a footer paragraph to the Wiki article stating that the WHOLE > > article is CC licensed and to disregard the GFDL footer at the > > bottom? This would only be for new Wiki articles. I am not > > proposing re-licensing existing Wiki articles. > > Just do it. > OK I will do. Anyone who objects to this should say so now. Ananda
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
