Re: Bad attitude in flyspray again!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Hi,

On Fri, 12 Mar 2010, Aaron Griffin wrote:
Commenting on closed bugs is not doable in Flyspray.

I didn't know it, thanks for the info! So I guess every argument
from now on is just for the sake of completion...


More-over, I think it is a bad idea. The only reason people want
commenting on closed bugs is so that they can argue with the
developers - give reasons why the bug shouldn't be closed. That's what
a reopen request is for. If that fails, then it's time to discuss it
directly with the developer in question


Once, on another project, I filed a feature request on Flyspray. I also attached some measurements that showed how slow was the current way of doing things. After some monts the feature got implemented and the bug closed. I liked the feature, the program was much faster, and I wanted to attach measurements from the same machine that showed the difference. I didn't because I felt a reopen request would bother the developers.

But even for true reopen requests, IMHO the request itself should be logged as a comment so that others can see it, and why it was rejected.


Dimitris



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux