Re: Bad attitude in flyspray again!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Bad attitude in flyspray again!
From: Dimitrios Apostolou <jimis@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:19:46 +0200 (GTB Standard Time)
In-reply-to: <20100310164218.295645f6@darkstar.galaxy.all>
Reply-to: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Alpine 2.00 (WNT 1167 2008-08-23)

My primary complaint against flyspray is that it doesn't allow comments tobe added after the bug is closed. The only way is by doing a request toreopen the bug, and even in that case your comment is not added to thecomment list.

Wouldn't this functionality remedy the "closing bugs early" situation? Isit supported in flyspray?



Dimitris

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bad attitude in flyspray again!
  - From: Heiko Baums
- Re: Bad attitude in flyspray again!
  - From: Aaron Griffin

References:
- Resigning as a Bug Wrangler
  - From: Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
- Re: Resigning as a Bug Wrangler
  - From: Dan McGee
- Re: Resigning as a Bug Wrangler
  - From: Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)
- Re: Resigning as a Bug Wrangler
  - From: Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
- Bad attitude in flyspray again!
  - From: Heiko Baums

Prev by Date: Re: what is the procedure when your find an out-of-date package in AUR?
Next by Date: Re: rsyncd pid file already exists
Previous by thread: Bad attitude in flyspray again!
Next by thread: Re: Bad attitude in flyspray again!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux