On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 16:40 +0100, hollunder@xxxxxx wrote: > On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 02:26:39 +0100 > Xavier <shiningxc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Anyway hal is dead : > > http://wiki.x.org/wiki/Events/XDC2009/Notes?highlight=%28hal%29|%28udev%29#head-75cccc4e4968dd043dcf2166dff61afd7d0d06c5 > > But since that functionality is definitely needed, it will have to be > > replaced.. somehow. > > > Isn't that somehow going to be device-kit? > If so, we won't get rid of dbus. Is that really a goal? Seems like the holy grail sometimes, getting rid of dbus.
