On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 3:31 AM, Allan McRae <allan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Arvid Picciani wrote: >> Let me quote "the arch way 2.0" which has a very nice condensed statement >> that does in fact support minimalism: > > Nice... so not the original Arch Way as defined by Judd that you keep > referring to... For those that do not know this version: > http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/The_Arch_Way_v2.0 . No offense meant to > Jules who started writing this, but you are quoting an interpretation of the > original design principles of Arch that has had absolutely no direct import > from any devs. I would just like to emphasize this point. I was going to post something to this effect. Look at the history of that wiki page. The authors have taken artistic license with it.
