Re: Another rant on arch way abuse and false promises

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Jan de Groot wrote:

Dbus support in wpa-supplicant is not broken. A not working
networkmanager is broken. We have to make a choice here, and having
broken software isn't the right choice, is it?


dbus is indeed broken. so its a different tradeof then you suggest.
Additionaly,  i don't intent to argue about that.

My point is that the idea of archlinux is not centered around the gnome desktop, but rather around upstream defaults.


--
Arvid
Asgaard Technologies


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux