Re: Another rant on arch way abuse and false promises

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 09:13 +0100, Arvid Picciani wrote:
> Arvid Picciani wrote:
> > Aaron Griffin wrote:
> 
> >> If you have legitimate, actionable fixes for anything you take issue
> >> with, please post them to the bug tracker. Until then, this is just
> >> hot air.
> > 
> > I take that as an invite to post packages to the tracker that adhere to 
> > the arch way. If this turns out to be another false promise, i will add 
> > that to the next iteration.
> 
> 
> please comment on: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17346
> 
> summary:
> 
> 1) I suggested reverting the dbus configure
>     flag to upstream default.
> 
> 2) Jan de Groot closed the bug with WONTFIX
>     since this revert WILL break
>     some third party gui configure util.

Dbus support in wpa-supplicant is not broken. A not working
networkmanager is broken. We have to make a choice here, and having
broken software isn't the right choice, is it?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux