Re: Can we use the "Firefox" name?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



I've a small dumb question.
Why not use official branded version when there are many licensing
problems? According to KISS and Arch philosophy (use upstream apps and
not to patch unless necessary) this should be a good way.

Regards
Lukas '6xx' Jirkovsky

2008/6/11 Sam Gwydir <gwydir8@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Wed Jun 11, 2008 at 04:3341PM +0200, Xavier wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Alper KANAT <alperkanat@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > As a user, I really dislike the name Iceweasel... I really dislike its logo
>> > and so on...
>> >
>>
>> Good for you! Then what?
>
> Then find a different name. Iceweasel isn't our only alternative.
>
>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux