On Wed 2008-06-11 05:46, Alessio 'mOLOk' Bolognino wrote: > There is a thing that I have never understood: we ship the Firefox > package not branded, for the well known issues with the licensing of the > artwork, and that's fine; but are we sure we can name that package > "firefox" ? If you ask it to me, I think we can not: > > Mike Connor (a Mozilla guy :) said here [1]: > "Firefox (the name) is equally protected and controlled by the same > trademark policy and legal requirements as the Firefox logo. You're > free to use any other name for the browser bits, but calling the browser > Firefox requires the same approvals as are required for using the logo > and other artwork. > [...] > If you are going to use the Firefox name, you must also use the rest of the > branding." > > Mozilla may say that we are "lying" to users, because the name is named > firefox, but it doesn't contain Firefox. > > Discuss! And I just found this old bug report: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/5795 I don't know why I missed it the first time I searched for it. -- Alessio (molok) Bolognino Please send personal email to themolok@xxxxxxxxx Public Key http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xFE0270FB GPG Key ID = 1024D / FE0270FB 2007-04-11 Key Fingerprint = 9AF8 9011 F271 450D 59CF 2D7D 96C9 8F2A FE02 70FB
Attachment:
pgpSZEomMAHv8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
