On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 1:40 PM, gan lu <rhythm.gan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We have community repo already, hand svn packages to community may work, but > I still think it could be better to distinguish such packages from anothers. > Unstable repo is useless if only a few people use it. Drop it if we can't > make it more useful, that's why I propose for a rename, to try to bring it > to the right direction. What Giovanni was proposing is using that already set up repo as a new community repo, since devs seem to be ok about dropping unstable, and at the moment community still relies on cvs (see my other mail about it). Corrado