2008/5/1 gan lu <rhythm.gan@xxxxxxxxx>: > As we know, many packages saying even firefox or openoffice in unstable repo > don't mean "unstable", instead, they are quite stable. The name of repo > simply doesn't reflect the fact, so how about a rename? > It's harmless and may even bring some good point, at least from a marketing > point, it may courage more devs or TUs to follow the upstream developing and > put more packages there, in return attract more people who are interested in > the package to do more (testing) work, which can eventually make the package > better quality. I vote for simply giving that repo to the TUs. Just my 2 cents. -- Giovanni Scafora Arch Linux Trusted User (voidnull) http://www.archlinux.org linuxmania@xxxxxxxxx
