Re: Rename 'unstable' to 'developing'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Giovanni Scafora <linuxmania@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  I vote for simply giving that repo to the TUs.

Why? It's true that we're all waiting for our own testing repo, but
using unstable won't help: the problem is AUR integration: a lot of
work still has to be done before community can move to svn, and then
support for an overlay repo has to be added from scratch. Using
unstable IMHO would just be a hassle, since it would also need to be
locked so that we never manage to touch other repos there.

Corrado



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux