On 2019/9/28 上午11:33, Hui Wang wrote:
On 2019/9/27 下午5:01, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
Dne 27. 09. 19 v 10:21 Hui Wang napsal(a):
So far, the alsa-lib still depends on the card->name/long-name to find
the needed UCM, I know some Dell machines also uses sof driver (so the
card->name/long-name is also sof-skl_hda_card), so if this UCM is
merged, it will be shared with Dell machines. But on those Dell
machines, there is no BASS Speaker, and Dell machines have sth that
Lenovo machines don't have, like headset-mic and headphone-mic. How to
make this UCM work on both Lenovo and Dell machines?
Thanks for this info. The long-name contains DMI info, so I updated the
configuration in this way:
Hello Jaroslav,
For the long->name with DMI info, is it a new feature or an old feature
that existing for a long time? If it is a new feature, is it implemented
by kernel driver or by alsa-lib, already upstreamed?
Thanks,
Hui.
https://github.com/alsa-project/alsa-ucm-conf/commit/ac8319245e1213e46a1ae5c2de4ddd4a0c8926e2
https://github.com/alsa-project/alsa-ucm-conf/commit/9bd0bf34a571a4a3c38d74098972d82c58fac80e
(everything is in the updated 'import' branch)
So you can add the specific config for the Dell device, too.
OK, that is good, thanks.
Regards,
Hui.
Jaroslav
Regards,
Hui.
On 2019/9/24 下午8:06, Mark Pearson wrote:
I think the first order would be to have the file cleaned-up,
with its
Intel origin clearly stated with a signed-off-by tag.
Then once this is done, the Debian package creation needs to be
handled (using either the ALSA repo or the cloned version on SOF
GitHub). I don't have any experience with Debian packages so can't
really comment on the effort it would take.
I did some cleanups here:
https://github.com/alsa-project/alsa-ucm-
conf/commit/f796f0852a097e238fa9f5efb174e95b5ee6c8b7
Pierre, could you confirm the original source and are you ok with
that?
I got confirmation from Intel that they are the original source -
they provided me with the files (as an aside in case it is
important, originally they were working with Canonical on getting
Ubuntu working on one of our (Lenovo) platforms). I was following
up with Canonical to just check what they had done but haven't
heard back yet.
Since Intel has provided the files to me directly - can I act as an
original source confirmation?
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
