Dne 19. 09. 19 v 17:15 Pierre-Louis Bossart napsal(a): > On 9/19/19 9:54 AM, Mark Pearson wrote: >>> >>> Indeed UCM is required for all cases where SOF and PulseAudio are used. >>> >>> Our thinking was however to add this UCM file to the new repository outside >>> of alsa-lib [1]. There is an on-going thread started by Jaroslav to move those >>> files and relicense them as BSD-3-Clause [2] >>> >>> [1] >>> https://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2019- >>> July/153257.html >>> [2] >>> https://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2019- >>> September/155246.html >> >> Thanks Pierre. >> >> Do we have any approximate timelines on when and how this will happen? (I'm new to this) >> >> One of my main aims is that we have a customer using Debian and one of our platforms that require this change - I need to make sure I understand how this would roll out and what actions they need to take in the meantime if it's not going to be available in Debian. > > I think the first order would be to have the file cleaned-up, with its > Intel origin clearly stated with a signed-off-by tag. > > Then once this is done, the Debian package creation needs to be handled > (using either the ALSA repo or the cloned version on SOF GitHub). I > don't have any experience with Debian packages so can't really comment > on the effort it would take. I did some cleanups here: https://github.com/alsa-project/alsa-ucm-conf/commit/f796f0852a097e238fa9f5efb174e95b5ee6c8b7 Pierre, could you confirm the original source and are you ok with that? Thank you, Jaroslav -- Jaroslav Kysela <perex@xxxxxxxx> Linux Sound Maintainer; ALSA Project; Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
