On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 01:36:50PM +0900, Jassi Brar wrote: > >> For us, having CPU in slave mode is more important than clearing all the >> use cases perfectly on a _reference_ platform. >> More so when the 'problem' can be obviously attributed to the h/w design. > > Hrm, OK - this is the opposite way around to what most CPU vendors would > ask for. Is there any particular reason for this preference? When CPU MASTER was default, people asked for SLAVE. But nobody asked for MASTER since we selected SLAVE by default. Both work equally well, it just saves our efforts. Btw, I thought CODEC usually provide more accurate signals and hence CPU SLAVE is better. Is is too wrong? _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
