On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 01:36:50PM +0900, Jassi Brar wrote: > For us, having CPU in slave mode is more important than clearing all the > use cases perfectly on a _reference_ platform. > More so when the 'problem' can be obviously attributed to the h/w design. Hrm, OK - this is the opposite way around to what most CPU vendors would ask for. Is there any particular reason for this preference? > So please modify only if you must, otherwise, as I said, we'd prefer > CPU slave mode working > by default in mainline. Well, I'd like to see the driver working as well as possible, especially since people tend to take reference code from mainline and clone it. The way the hardware is the clock tree should definitely be rooted in the WM8580, it's just the LRCLK and BCLK I'm thinking about here. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
