On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 03:00:31PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:24:18AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Andrew Morton >> >> <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> > On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 11:54:50 -0700 >> >> > Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> This is no longer needed by any userspace tools, so it's safe to >> >> >> remove. >> >> >> >> Also still used for booting mainline kernels on RHEL5 userspaces. >> > >> > Really? ?I thought that was fixed a long time ago. ?What kernel was >> > RHEL5 originally based on? >> > >> > And note that no RHEL5 user is going to be using a .36 kernel on their >> > system, that's a completely unsupported and unadvised situation. ?Heck, >> > I'd be amazed if a .34 kernel.org kernel boots on the thing, does it? >> > >> >> I think some people do it internally, last time I did it was to test >> something I was backporting, so you want to make sure the upstream >> version boots and the backported version also boots on the same >> hw/userspace. >> >> original kernel was 2.6.18. > > Yes, that was the number, but does it really look anything like a .18 > kernel.org release? :) > Well its more that the userspace is mostly what was released at the same time, we aren't going to update udev/mkinitrd unless some major problem was discovered. Dave. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
