On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 03:00:31PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:24:18AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Andrew Morton > >> <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 11:54:50 -0700 > >> > Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > > >> >> This is no longer needed by any userspace tools, so it's safe to > >> >> remove. > >> > >> Also still used for booting mainline kernels on RHEL5 userspaces. > > > > Really? ?I thought that was fixed a long time ago. ?What kernel was > > RHEL5 originally based on? > > > > And note that no RHEL5 user is going to be using a .36 kernel on their > > system, that's a completely unsupported and unadvised situation. ?Heck, > > I'd be amazed if a .34 kernel.org kernel boots on the thing, does it? > > > > I think some people do it internally, last time I did it was to test > something I was backporting, so you want to make sure the upstream > version boots and the backported version also boots on the same > hw/userspace. > > original kernel was 2.6.18. Yes, that was the number, but does it really look anything like a .18 kernel.org release? :) I'll test this out next week. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
