On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:24:18AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Andrew Morton > <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 11:54:50 -0700 > > Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> This is no longer needed by any userspace tools, so it's safe to > >> remove. > > Also still used for booting mainline kernels on RHEL5 userspaces. Really? I thought that was fixed a long time ago. What kernel was RHEL5 originally based on? And note that no RHEL5 user is going to be using a .36 kernel on their system, that's a completely unsupported and unadvised situation. Heck, I'd be amazed if a .34 kernel.org kernel boots on the thing, does it? > Live with your mistakes guys, don't try and bury them. I'm not, I honestly thought that we had resolved these issues. So, which version of Centos matches up with RHEL5 so I can go download it and see if I can resolve this? We might just be able to reduce the ammount of code we remove here and keep the Kconfig option around, if that old userspace is expecting a portion of the symlinks to still be present. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
