Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 05:40:27PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 11:54:50 -0700 >> > Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> >> This is no longer needed by any userspace tools, so it's safe to >> >> remove. >> > >> > Makes my FC6 test box not boot - can't find /dev/root. Then when I go >> > back to plain old mainline (2.6.35-rc5) and run `make oldconfig', the >> > .config change sticks: >> > >> > @@ -106,8 +106,7 @@ >> > CONFIG_LOG_BUF_SHIFT=17 >> > CONFIG_HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK=y >> > # CONFIG_CGROUPS is not set >> > -CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED=y >> > -CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED_V2=y >> > +# CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED_V2 is not set >> > CONFIG_RELAY=y >> > CONFIG_NAMESPACES=y >> > # CONFIG_UTS_NS is not set >> > >> > and the box still won't boot. >> >> The reason FC6 doesn't boot is there is a userspace tool >> I believe in the initrd that cares about symlinks when it should >> not. > > Anyone happen to know which tool it is? I remember we had had issues > with FC3 around this area, but I thought we resolved them, so it's > supprising to me that FC6 has issues. It was something in the initrd, that didn't like the symlinks. It has been a year or more since I looked at it. At that point I just enabled SYSFS_DEPRECATED and moved on. >> What is more interesting is that currently there is a bug in >> 2.6.35-rc5 where rmmod <netdriver> modprobe <netdriver> will in fact >> fail. There was an inadvertent regression and no one has noticed or >> complained. I spotted it by code review just a little bit ago and I >> haven't had a chance to write and test the fix yet. >> >> If the code is going to start bitrotting and no one is going to >> notice or care simply removing the code instead of subjecting users >> to weird unexpected breakage seems like a responsible thing to do. > > Yeah, that's what prompted this removal. After the s390 guys said that > they were all good to go, I figured no one else would have problems with > it :) > > If it turns out there still are issues with older userspaces like FC6 > that we can't resolve, I have no problem dropping this patch and then we > will have to fix up the regression. I still have to test it but it looks like a one liner. Actually two lines now that I have to fix the error in symlink creation as well. Eric _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
