On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:24:18AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Andrew Morton >> <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 11:54:50 -0700 >> > Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> >> This is no longer needed by any userspace tools, so it's safe to >> >> remove. >> >> Also still used for booting mainline kernels on RHEL5 userspaces. > > Really? I thought that was fixed a long time ago. What kernel was > RHEL5 originally based on? > > And note that no RHEL5 user is going to be using a .36 kernel on their > system, that's a completely unsupported and unadvised situation. Heck, > I'd be amazed if a .34 kernel.org kernel boots on the thing, does it? > I think some people do it internally, last time I did it was to test something I was backporting, so you want to make sure the upstream version boots and the backported version also boots on the same hw/userspace. original kernel was 2.6.18. Dave. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
