Hi, > > > > The first round of patches were really invasive regarding the core > > > > code. So if there is a clean layering approach which can be enabled > > > > as a module and you are maintaining it I'm fine with that (even if > > > > the core code needs some changes then like hooks or so, not sure). > > > > > > That discussion started with Miquel some years ago when he was trying to to > > > solve description in DT which is merged for a while in the kernel. > > > > What's your point here? From what I can tell the DT binding is wrong > > and needs to be reworked anyway. > > I'm sorry I'm now catching up, can you point at the thread explaining > what is wrong in the bindings? I didn't find where this was detailed. Or > otherwise summarize quickly what needs to change? Somewhere in this mega thread Tudor had some remarks about the bindings. Amit also mentioned it here: https://lore.kernel.org/r/IA0PR12MB769944254171C39FF4171B52DCB42@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ -michael
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
