On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 15:59 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > On Tue, 2020-03-31 at 16:30 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > > I have no attachment to 40x, and I'd certainly be happy to have > > > less > > > code in the tree, we struggle to keep even the modern platforms > > > well > > > maintained. > > > > > > At the same time I don't want to render anyone's hardware > > > obsolete > > > unnecessarily. But if there's really no one using 40x then we > > > should > > > remove it, it could well be broken already. > > > > > > So I guess post a series to do the removal and we'll see if > > > anyone > > > speaks up. > > > > We shouldn't remove 40x completely. Just remove the Xilinx 405 > > stuff. > > Congratulations on becoming the 40x maintainer! Didn't I give you my last 40x system ? :-) IBM still put 40x cores inside POWER chips no ? Cheers, Ben.
