Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tue, 2020-03-31 at 16:30 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: >> I have no attachment to 40x, and I'd certainly be happy to have less >> code in the tree, we struggle to keep even the modern platforms well >> maintained. >> >> At the same time I don't want to render anyone's hardware obsolete >> unnecessarily. But if there's really no one using 40x then we should >> remove it, it could well be broken already. >> >> So I guess post a series to do the removal and we'll see if anyone >> speaks up. > > We shouldn't remove 40x completely. Just remove the Xilinx 405 stuff. Congratulations on becoming the 40x maintainer! cheers
