On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 02:22:55PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 2:15 PM Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 03:10:26PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 01:54:33PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 1:12 PM Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: ... > > > > It does raise a follow-up question about ppc40x though: is it time to > > > > retire all of it? > > > > > > Who knows? > > > > > > I have in possession nice WD My Book Live, based on this architecture, and I > > > won't it gone from modern kernel support. OTOH I understand that amount of real > > > users not too big. > > > > +Cc: Christian Lamparter, whom I owe for that WD box. > > According to https://openwrt.org/toh/wd/mybooklive, that one is based on > APM82181/ppc464, so it is about several generations newer than what I > asked about (ppc40x). > > > > Ah, and I have Amiga board, but that one is being used only for testing, so, > > > I don't care much. > > I think there are a couple of ppc440 based Amiga boards, but again, not 405 > to my knowledge. Ah, you are right. No objections from ppc40x removal! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
