On Tue, 2020-03-31 at 16:30 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > I have no attachment to 40x, and I'd certainly be happy to have less > code in the tree, we struggle to keep even the modern platforms well > maintained. > > At the same time I don't want to render anyone's hardware obsolete > unnecessarily. But if there's really no one using 40x then we should > remove it, it could well be broken already. > > So I guess post a series to do the removal and we'll see if anyone > speaks up. We shouldn't remove 40x completely. Just remove the Xilinx 405 stuff. Cheers, Ben.
