>> OK, so I never quite understood why you don't want BSD-licensed code in >> alsa, but I've already said I'm willing to allow relicensing to LGPL as >> long as it doesn't mean too much pollution in my source files. > > That's good. Keeping the single license in the whole tree is very > important. > > BTW, what one calls "pollution" can be "sanitization" for others. > That's the opensource development... Here's the deal. You give me a paragraph that adds the LGPL license in no more then 5 lines and I'll add it to the resampler header now. >> Note BTW >> that if you want to link with libspeex directly then you'll need to live >> with the BSD license because there are some parts of Speex that cannot >> be dual-licensed because I don't own the copyright. > > If we reuse the libspeex shlib, we won't do it from alsa-lib but from > the existing plugin in alsa-plugins package. So, alsa-lib will stay > unchanged. No more plans to have the resampler in alsa-lib? > Actually, any optimization would be interesting for us, too. Good. Actually, if you know anyone good at SSE code, I'm interested :-) Jean-Marc _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
