Re: ATC Wannabies?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Donald
You missed the point totally.  Once again as I said in the earlier posting
People equate airports with terminal buildings because thats all they see.
The subject was ATC (Air Traffic Control) wannabies.  ATC does not care
about the  amenities of a terminal building.  They're concern is the
"airport movement" areas.  ie runways and taxiways.  Even the ramp/gate
(non-movement) areas at airports like ORD and PIT as well as many others is
totally controlled by the specific companies.  I most instances at theses
airports thew first time they talk to Ground control is when they are pushed
back with the engines started and the are at the "hot spot" (#1 to leave the
non-movement) area.  You can have the largest most modern terminal
building(s) that if you do not have the runway and taxiway structure would
remain empty.  Almost all major airports are land locked.  That's why
Denver was moved to the middle of nowhere.
Al

----- Original Message -----
From: "Donald Mamula" <mamula@xxxxxx>
To: <AIRLINE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 10:24 AM
Subject: Re: ATC Wannabies?


> On 15 Jan 2004 at 9:19, Allan9 wrote:
>
> > The airport was built to accomodate both aircraft and passenger
movements.
> > Maximum use of runways.  Most airports all the people think about is the
> > terminal building(s).  DFW is another example.  The old time airports
> > ORD/PIT/CLE/DTW etc all grew up piecemeal.  They were and still are
playing
> > catch up.
>
> I would agree with you on ORD and CLE, but PIT and the new terminal
> at DTW were most assuredly results of today's hub environment.  I can
> tell you that the O&D at PIT in no way justifies that large a
> terminal.  And DTW was designed as a one-airline hub.
>
> When you think about it....what airports have really been built (or
> greatly expanded/rebuilt) since the hub/spoke concept was developed?
> You'll find they have either been designed as hubs (PIT/DTW/CVG/CLT)
> or as end points of spokes (MCO/TPA).  DFW just took its existing
> design and copied it for crappy hub connections.  Just ask any AA or
> DL flier who had to get from one end of a horseshoe to another.
>

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]