NYTimes.com Article: Yes, It Was a Dismal Year for Airlines. Now the Bad News.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This article from NYTimes.com
has been sent to you by psa188@juno.com.



Yes, It Was a Dismal Year for Airlines. Now the Bad News.

December 16, 2002
By MICHELINE MAYNARD






As bad as 2002 was for the airline industry, with two big
bankruptcy filings, next year might be worse.

Continued financial turmoil, growing labor-management
confrontation, unhappy passengers and possible
international conflict are looming. Even the most
optimistic people involved with the industry have little
clue about when a turnaround might come.

"No one that I know of is predicting an opportunity for the
industry to get out of this," said Kevin P. Mitchell,
chairman of the Business Travel Coalition, which represents
corporate travel departments and business travelers. "Even
if the economy were to nicely firm up, that's an
insufficient catalyst for recovery."

The most immediate concern, though, is whether another
airline, most likely American Airlines, will follow United
Airlines and US Airways into Chapter 11 bankruptcy
reorganization. Already, the United bankruptcy announcement
on Dec. 9 and the US Airways filing in August have set in
motion extensive industrywide cost-cutting measures. This
year, airlines are expected to have the deepest losses in
aviation history.

Just days before United filed for Chapter 11 protection
from creditors, American's chief executive, Donald J.
Carty, began meeting with employees to ask for a freeze on
wages and further cuts aimed at reducing expenses $4
billion a year.

"The restructuring of our labor agreements is inevitable
and fundamental to our long-term goal of remaining
competitive and restoring profitability," said Mr. Carty,
who, like other senior managers at American, is forgoing a
raise for a second year.

If United is able to reduce labor costs in bankruptcy court
over the next few months, management at its competitors
will certainly ask union leaders for similar concessions.

But capitulation may not be automatic. "Airline employees
are not going to want to change the conditions that have
grown up over all the years since World War II, but they
have to change, and change very dramatically," said Robert
L. Crandall, a retired chairman and chief executive of
American.

The industry views the tough bankruptcy experience that US
Airways has had as a cautionary tale. Going into its
filing, US Airways seemed to have done everything right: it
had won provisional approval for federal loan guarantees,
unlike United, whose application to a federal loan board
was rejected. US Airways also won concessions from its
union, and engaged the Texas Pacific Group, a private
equity firm that has invested in several troubled airlines,
to prepare its reorganization.

Texas Pacific, however, was outbid by the Retirement
Systems of Alabama, which will take voting control of the
airline once it emerges from bankruptcy. Before that
happens, however, US Airways is trying to wrest more wage
and benefit concessions from its unions. It has a real
incentive in the threat by the retirement systems' chief
executive, David G. Bronner, to withdraw its financing and
send the airline into liquidation if the unions do not
comply.

Management is not the only group facing turmoil. Passengers
are feeling the pinch of the airlines' drastic actions as
well. Beginning Jan. 1, a number of big airlines will
institute $100 fees for passengers who want to stand by for
a different flight. (One exception is United, which decided
to cancel the fees after passengers complained.) Airlines
are putting in place "use it or lose it" policies,
rendering nonrefundable tickets completely worthless if a
passenger does not travel. They are not even good for a
credit against future travel, as they have been in the
past.

Along with those changes, airlines are beginning to take
aim at their frequent-flier programs as well. Delta Air
Lines is leading a drive to give greater rewards to
passengers who pay more for their tickets, bolstering
mileage awards to full-fare coach and business-class
passengers, and reducing them for customers who seek the
cheapest fares.

Given that miles have been one of the airlines' best tools
for generating loyalty, Mr. Mitchell predicts the Delta
move will further fuel the shift of passengers to low-fare
airlines, which have their own frequent-flier programs. The
low-fare carriers expect to pick up business in the year
ahead.

Southwest Airlines, which began transcontinental service
this fall, will focus on adding flights from the cities it
already serves, rather than adding destinations. That is a
blow to the 115 cities on its waiting list for new service,
but the strategy will give Southwest an even better chance
to take on big carriers. One such is American, which
competes with Southwest on 70 percent of its routes. Unlike
its rivals, Southwest has been working on its labor
situation all year. It has reached agreements with pilots
and, most recently, ground personnel, which could prove to
be great timing if other airlines are affected by labor
strife.

JetBlue, meanwhile, will be expanding service, too. This
fall, after National Airlines went out of business, JetBlue
was able to get a head start on service to Las Vegas, which
had been planned for 2003. National had offered the only
direct flights between New York and Las Vegas. JetBlue
plans to add even more Las Vegas flights in coming months
and has its own list of cities trying to win its business.

Not all is rosy for the low-fare carriers, however. Both
Delta and United have announced plans to create their own
low-fare carriers, something they have tried and failed to
accomplish in the past. The Delta low-fare airline, which
has yet to be named, will operate between New York and
Florida, using Boeing 757 jets that will be reconfigured to
seat 199 coach class passengers. United plans to restart
its West Coast shuttle, which was a success in its early
years but ultimately fell victim to the dominance of
low-fare carriers on California routes.

The one unpredictable factor hanging over the industry,
affecting both airlines and passengers, is what will happen
in the case of a war with Iraq. With companies already
cutting travel budgets because of the weak economy, any
outbreak would provide another excuse for businesses to
keep managers at home. Though leisure travel has largely
bounced back from the September 2001 attacks, airlines fear
that any level of uncertainty could cause people to put off
trips until they feel more comfortable about flying.

The uncertainties are one reason Mr. Bronner pushed
management at US Airways to prepare a plan to deal with a
war. Competitors probably have their own contingency plans
by now, as well. Compared with war, the usual things that
disrupt travel during coming months, like snowstorms, may
seem easy to bear.

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/12/16/business/businessspecial/16AIR.html?ex=1041058591&ei=1&en=9bd72b9014a8d76d



HOW TO ADVERTISE
---------------------------------
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters
or other creative advertising opportunities with The
New York Times on the Web, please contact
onlinesales@nytimes.com or visit our online media
kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo

For general information about NYTimes.com, write to
help@nytimes.com.

Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]