SF Gate: Airlines try business-fare cuts, find no revenue loss

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



=20
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This article was sent to you by someone who found it on SF Gate.
The original article can be found on SFGate.com here:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=3D/news/archive/2002/11/22/f=
inancial1023EST0047.DTL
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Friday, November 22, 2002 (AP)
Airlines try business-fare cuts, find no revenue loss
SCOTT MCCARTNEY, The Wall Street Journal


   (11-22) 07:23 PST (AP) --
   Airlines are finally starting to cut back sky-high business-travel fares.
   They are conducting a series of tests to see if lower fares will bring
back business travelers who are staying home, buying in advance or running
to discount airlines. Early results are encouraging some carriers to
believe that they can cut business fares and actually maintain or increase
revenue.
   Delta Air Lines has cut business fares in the last two months by about 21
percent in more than 400 small markets with no announcement, yielding a
double-digit increase in revenue. Continental Airlines, which has been one
of the staunchest defenders of the current fare structure, has been very
quietly conducting tests of lower business airfares since June in select
markets. Results have been mixed but not discouraging, Continental
officials say.
   Northwest Airlines and America West Holdings Corp. also have experimented
with cheaper fares aimed at business travelers. AMR Corp.'s American on
Monday said it cut business fares by 40 percent in 23 markets and raised
leisure fares at the same time; it is expected to push the new structure
out nationwide.
   The new unrestricted prices at full-service airlines -- $1,200 in many
markets for a last-minute booking instead of $2,000 -- are still higher
than discount carriers, but the gap has been narrowed, and the new fares
are popping up in an increasing number of markets.
   "It's starting already to have a domino effect," says Bob Harrell of fare
analyst Harrell Associates in New York, a consulting firm.
   Amid a devastating drop in demand that will result in roughly $4 billion
in losses this year, major airlines have been searching for ways to
generate more revenue by luring back high-ticket business travelers.
Walk-up fares hadn't been cut much since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.
American CEO Don Carty has conceded customers feel "gouged." Corporate
travel managers and Wall Street analysts have suggested for more than a
year that airlines need to slash business-travel fares simply because
corporate travelers were refusing to buy.
   But carriers have resisted -- until now. Some feared a repeat of a 1992
debacle when American imposed a new, simplified "Value Pricing" scheme,
and suffered huge losses when competitors retaliated and undercut its
prices. Others said cutting prices made no sense when carriers need every
penny they can get. Carriers have been slow to change, says one airline
executive, because "we can't afford to be carrying more people for less
money."
   Airlines have long believed that road warriors would travel no matter wh=
at
the airfare. That held true when the economy was booming and planes were
full on popular routes, but it's a harder argument today, with budgets
tight and many empty seats offering travelers more choices.
   "Five years from now, instead of a pricing structure with business fares
five or six times, on average, higher than discounted fares, I would
expect it to be about 3-to-1," said one airline executive, shy about being
named because the Justice Department bans public discussion of future fare
actions. "It will tighten."
   Continental now has some positive-looking results -- but not a definitive
answer to the problem. Instead of relying on a full-coach, round-trip
unrestricted fare of about $2,000 between Cleveland and Los Angeles, for
example, Continental since June has offered a $716 unrestricted fare in
that market, about $118 higher than Southwest Airlines. Through October,
the test resulted in about the same revenue that Continental thinks it
would have collected with its higher fare. But Continental did gain market
share, taking passengers from Southwest, most likely, and from connecting
service on carriers such as UAL Corp.'s United Airlines.
   Continental made similar changes on routes from Cleveland to Houston, and
from Houston to cities in Florida. It found the new fare structure yielded
less revenue but more market share. The same test in Houston-Oakland
produced higher revenue and didn't dilute traffic from Continental's
service to San Francisco.
   "We haven't found the silver bullet to say it's a huge success," says Jim
Compton, Continental's senior vice president of pricing and revenue
management. The tests remain in place, Continental says.
   Delta's unannounced testing offers clearer evidence of the impact of low=
er
business-travel pricing. Delta lowered unrestricted walk-up fares by about
21 percent in small markets over a seven-week test period this fall, and
yielded double-digit revenue gains, compared with the previous year,
according to a report put out Tuesday by J.P. Morgan airline analyst Jamie
Baker.
   "Unless one assumes that Spokane business travelers are uniquely frugal
with respect to air fares, we'd assume the results of Delta's experimental
fares are repeatable elsewhere," Mr. Baker says.
   A Delta spokesman declined to comment on the fare test but did say the
Atlanta-based carrier doesn't dispute anything in the J.P. Morgan report.
   So far, other carriers have matched most of American's changes, as well =
as
other carriers' experiments.
   Analysts believe American is moving toward a nationwide overhaul -- but =
in
small steps. In the markets American is testing, including some of its
biggest markets such as Dallas-Los Angeles, the new fare structure will
undoubtedly produce less revenue in the short term, analysts say, but it
still could be considered a success. If American can gain market share
back from discount carriers, reduce complaints from customers and
stimulate more business travel, the new fare structure would likely pay
off in the long run.
   "It's going to produce less revenue in the short term, and it's going to
be rolled out nationwide," says Sam Buttrick of UBS Warburg. "To change
people's behavior, and get travelers away from thinking, `These guys are
trying to s___- me,' takes a long time."

=20
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright 2002 AP

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]