Re: Question on check-process / autoconf-2.6.3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



According to Ralf Wildenhues on 1/6/2010 12:26 PM:

Hi Ralf,

> 
> That sounds like a good compromise.  Proposed patch below; OK to commit?
> Dieter, OK to add you to THANKS?  FWIW, I think it is customary to do so
> without name affixes like Dr.

Yes, your fix looks like what I was describing.  I assume you've tested it
with competing automake versions, so go ahead and apply.

Deiter added:
> P.S. by the way: Ralf, the fix you applied does not go into original 2.63, doesn't it? My file 
> tools.at has the relevant lines at a very different location.

Correct - the patch is against the bleeding edge of development, and will
appear when 2.66 is released.  It is up to your distro whether they want
to backport it to a re-release of 2.63.

-- 
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!

Eric Blake             ebb9@xxxxxxx

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux