Re: Question on check-process / autoconf-2.6.3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi folks,
thank you for the honor, but this feedback of mine isn't even worth mentioning - so keep me out of 
the log, the work has been done by someone else. 
And be assured that it is of no importance whether you denote the "Dr" or don't if you still think 
my "contribution" is worth mentioning ...

Thank you _very_ much for looking into this and fixing the issue.
Take care




Dieter

P.S. by the way: Ralf, the fix you applied does not go into original 2.63, doesn't it? My file 
tools.at has the relevant lines at a very different location.

Am Mittwoch 06 Januar 2010 20:26:40 schrieb Ralf Wildenhues:
***************
> That sounds like a good compromise.  Proposed patch below; OK to commit?
> Dieter, OK to add you to THANKS?  FWIW, I think it is customary to do so
> without name affixes like Dr.
***************

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------

                               |
                                \
                 /\_/\           |
                | ~x~ |/-----\   /
                 \   /-       \_/
  ^^__   _        /  _  ____   /
 <°°__ \- \_/     |  |/    |  |
  ||  ||         _| _|    _| _|

if you really want to see the pictures above - use some font
with constant spacing like courier! :-)
-----------------------------------------------------------



_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf


[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux