Re: rpm 4.2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I would agree the fault lies entirely on Red Hat if it weren't for this snippet from updateinfo.xml

  <update from="security@xxxxxxxxxx" status="final" type="security" version="6">
    <id>RHSA-2009:0256-06</id>
    <title>RHSA-2009:0256</title>
    <issued date="2009-02-04 00:00:00" />
    <updated date="2009-02-04 00:00:00" />
........
        <package channel="rhel-i386-server-5" name="xulrunner" version="1.9.0.6" release="1.el5" epoch="0" arch="i386">
          <filename>xulrunner-1.9.0.6-1.el5.i386.rpm</filename>
          <sum type="md5">c869dbbf27a945f181ebe0a8607f4bb3</sum>
        </package>
        <package channel="rhel-i386-server-5" name="firefox" version="3.0.6" release="1.el5" epoch="0" arch="i386">
          <filename>firefox-3.0.6-1.el5.i386.rpm</filename>
          <sum type="md5">88290d56c1fa0185c6375058da16acdb</sum>
        </package>
.........


Using update-minimal installs firefox-3.0.6-1.el5.i386.rpm, why does it not install xulrunner-1.9.0.6-1.el5.i386.rpm as well? It is provided by the advisory. If I install firefox 3.0.1 I am able to use `yum update-minimal --advisory=RHSA-2009:0256-06` and it installs the proper versions of both Firefox and xulrunner:

 Package                    Arch                  Version                          Repository                           Size
=============================================================================================================================
Updating:
 firefox                    i386                  3.0.6-1.el5                      rhel-i386-server-5                   12 M
 nss                        i386                  3.12.2.0-4.el5                   rhel-i386-server-5                  1.1 M
 nss-tools                  i386                  3.12.2.0-4.el5                   rhel-i386-server-5                  1.2 M
 xulrunner                  i386                  1.9.0.6-1.el5                    rhel-i386-server-5                  9.9 M

So obviously yum does know about the version of xulrunner it needs, it just disregards it when it is installing and not upgrading.

On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Seth Vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Joshua Bahnsen wrote:

rpm -Va --nofiles --nomd5
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.13224: line 851: IntegrateWithGNOME: command not found

I think I understand the heart of the issue though.

Here is the requirements section from Firefox 3.0.6:

<rpm:entry name="xulrunner" flags="GE" epoch="0" ver="1.9.0.6" rel="1"/>

Because it is GE and not EQ yum determines the requirement and says, I can provide xulrunner 1.9.0.7 because it is the
latest and it meets the requirement of >= 1.9.0.6. Although it should probably be an EQ because the Firefox 3.0.6 with
xulrunner 1.9.0.7 does not work, this appears to fall on Red Hat. However, I do think update-minimal should realize that
the advisory I'm trying to install looks for a specific version of xulrunner (1.9.0.6 in this case) and check to see if
that version meets the requirement (which it does) and to see if that package is available in the repository (which it
is) and install that version, not the latest.


And if the requirements said EQ then it would have done that - but the assumption yum (and others) use is that newer is better, provided all the deps are met.

Please report the requirement problem  as a bug to rhel.


-sv

_______________________________________________
Yum mailing list
Yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum

_______________________________________________
Yum mailing list
Yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux