The problem wasn't that the update repo wasn't enabled, because there were definitely packages in the output of "yum list". The problem was that it was the old fc9 update repo (the one before the key change) that was enabled. Fixing things up to use the new repo corrected the problem and an update is running as I compose this. I appreciate all the responses :) Casey - Hide quoted text - On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 1:54 AM, Jan Hutař <jhutar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:19:11 -0500 > "Casey Boone" <caseyboone@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> As you can see, the fc8 version of cups-libs is newer than the fc9 >> version of cups (by version string that is, might be the same >> otherwise, haven't dug into it). It looks like the cups-libs package >> functionality has been rolled into something else, I am assuming the >> cups package directly. > > Maybe also enabling F9 updates repo could help. I have: > > cups-libs-1.3.8-2.fc9 > > installed. > > Regards, > Jan > > -- > Jan Hutar Quality Assurance Engineer > jhutar@xxxxxxxxxx Red Hat, Inc. > On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 1:54 AM, Jan Hutař <jhutar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:19:11 -0500 > "Casey Boone" <caseyboone@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> As you can see, the fc8 version of cups-libs is newer than the fc9 >> version of cups (by version string that is, might be the same >> otherwise, haven't dug into it). It looks like the cups-libs package >> functionality has been rolled into something else, I am assuming the >> cups package directly. > > Maybe also enabling F9 updates repo could help. I have: > > cups-libs-1.3.8-2.fc9 > > installed. > > Regards, > Jan > > -- > Jan Hutar Quality Assurance Engineer > jhutar@xxxxxxxxxx Red Hat, Inc. > _______________________________________________ Yum mailing list Yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum
