I am experiencing a problem in trying to upgrade a machine from fc8 to fc9 via yum. What I am seeing is a lot of this: Error: Missing Dependency: libldap-2.3.so.0 is needed by package gnupg2-2.0.9-2.fc8.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: libldap-2.3.so.0 is needed by package httpd-2.2.9-1.fc8.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: libssl.so.6 is needed by package httpd-tools-2.2.9-1.fc8.i386 (installed) It isn't seeing "httpd-tools-2.2.9-1.fc9.i386.rpm" as a needed upgrade. I can verify with "yum list" queries that it knows the fc9 version is available to it. Is there anyway to tell yum that a package tagged for fc9 is newer than one tagged fc8? This machine has made the journey from 7 to 8 just fine and I would rather continue this path rather than have to physically take the machine offline for doing the upgrade from dvd. The machine isn't in an easy to get to position. I have manually ran "rpm -Uvh <file>" for quite a few packages, including yum itself, but I don't want to have to do it for all of them (assuming I don't run into some dependency problem in the process) So to restate the question, can yum be forced into thinking that an fc9 version of a package is indeed an update to an fc8 version of a package if the version numbers are the same? I have checked the man pages and tried several searches of both the web and just the yum mailing list archive, and I don't see a solution, but admittedly I might have overlooked it in all the results. I did discover another person having the same problem I am, but there was no resolution posted for him at the forum he posted to. _______________________________________________ Yum mailing list Yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum
