[Yum] Re: yum 2.2 (or 3?), FC3, coexistence with "old" yum (was: yum 2.1.8)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 10:40:49AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > Already done a few thread steps above (requoted the part). It's not
> > server-side, that's easy. It's ensuring that the client side will
> > work, and also that it won't break all repos. If freshrpms upgrades
> > yum to yum-2.1.x or yum-2.2, a lot of freshrpms users will find that
> > their other "old" yum repos are dead, and they won't have a handle to
> > use them.
> 
> Except that I went around to all of the major repository maintainers and
> in most cases convinced them to run createrepo on their repositories.

Interesting, I have never heard of that action, and I also find that
most repos I currently use lack the new metadata structures.

Well, I guess you will have this all sorted out. I was just trying to
be constructive. If my arguments don't convince, that's OK, at least
they were heard ;)
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.dulug.duke.edu/pipermail/yum/attachments/20041019/4c9f4bd7/attachment.bin

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux