Hi, On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 01:33:55AM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > Hi All, > Yum 2.1.8 is available. This is not feature complete for the 2.1 series > - NOTE 2.1.X is a devel series of functional releases. When it reaches > feature-parity with 2.0.X it will become 2.2. We're very close now. o will a feature complete yum 2.2.0 make it for FC3? Official devel freeeze is tomorrow. o since yum 2.2 and yum 2.0 are not compatible, there will be a transition period for old vs new metadata. It would be nice to be able to install both old and new yum. What's the best way to go? Rename yum 2.0.x to "yumold"? o should yum 2.2 perhaps become yum3 and be also called that way to indicate the major change and allow coexitence with yum 2.0.x w/o renaming yum 2.0.x? I am mainly thinking of the current yum repos that have yum 2.0.x clients deployed and will be migrating to the new metadata format, and will want to have a (rather) smooth transition (e.g. offer both formats and both clients and allow a grace period for the users to switch). Thanks. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.dulug.duke.edu/pipermail/yum/attachments/20041019/993f9ac5/attachment.bin
