On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 02:49:14AM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > I haven't seen it in front of names, only in front of > > versions. Why don't you simply use the notation of the header > > files (name-epoch-andsoon)? > take a look in header.info and notice the notation there :) That's what I meant, I should have written hdr instead of header ;) > what if I displayed them as: name epoch:ver-rel.arch? would that look > good enough to everyone? Yes, that looks very good, as it is often written that way. > leaving out the epoch if it equals 0. > > Praying for an epoch free rpm 6.0 ... > good luck. Faith has nothing to do with luck. Only self-imposed illusions to get around the day. ;) (which is rue for luck, also, hmmm) -- Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.dulug.duke.edu/pipermail/yum/attachments/20030811/86c4ac73/attachment.bin
