> Well... I find it a bit strange :-/ > - Why do I get n/4 for only 2 packages? Does it now show progress for > "removed" packages during an upgrade!? Not very intuitive, although maybe > useful to see the order in which things were done. it is showing them - though that was not what I intended. I'll do some more tests on that, see if I can figure out why it's doing that. > - What is this "0:" prepended to the package names? Apparently the ones I > upgraded don't have epoch set, so that's not it, unless yum now explicitly > shows how things are treated... but having it before the version would make > more sense, no? it's the epoch. remember null=0. It's on the front of the name b/c that's where I've always seen it written - mostly b/c you can parse it from right to left that way more easily. I think I'll remove it from the display if it is 0. It'll be a prettier output for the user. thanks -sv
