On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 08:08:28 +0200, David Schweizer wrote: > Hello Peter, > > Thank you for your answer. > > The problem is that i would like to use the feature in a production > environment and can not rely on out of tree patches. Well, you certainly can contribute in having them merged. Even testing is a contribution. > > In regard to my question i conclude the following: > - There is currently no support for iSER storage objects in libvirt. No. > - There will not be support for iSER storage objects in the next few > libvirt releases. Depends on the status of the patches. I've reviewed them yesterday and I don't agree with the design. If you have more knowledge of how those things work, even explaining them is a contribution to possbily adding the feature. > Which for me, at least at the moment, means dropping iSER/IB, using > iSCSI/TCP/IPoIB and loosing some performance or using a commercially > available hypervisor. Well, for us that means that we don't have anybody willing to give input on the feature. I don't have experience nor hardware for testing it and don't have knowledge on how e.g. addressing works.
