On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:40:42AM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: > On 04/17/2014 07:57 AM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 04:26:42PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: > >>> The libosinfo bug tracker seems to be entirely ignored, doesn't look like any > >>> bug that's ever been filed has had a response: > >>> > >>> https://fedorahosted.org/libosinfo/report/8 > >>> > >>> There's at least 3 patches in there as well. > >>> > >>> I assume this is mostly due to trac being really easy to ignore, and default > >>> assignee + cc list not setup. How do people feel about moving the bug tracker > >>> to bugzilla.redhat.com product=Virtualization Tools, which is what libvirt*, > >>> libguestfs, and virt-manager use. > >>> > >>> If so the process would be: > >>> > >>> - request the component with bugzilla-requests@xxxxxxxxxx. they will need > >>> default assignee and cc list at least. > >>> - change libosinfo.org to point to the bugzilla instance rather than trac > >>> - once that's done, transfer over all the trac bugs, though I suspect many of > >>> them are obsolete. > >>> - send a request to fedora infrastructure to disable the trac bug tracker for > >>> https://fedorahosted.org/libosinfo/ (in fact, they can probably disable > >>> this page entirely, it's redundant since there's already libosinfo.org) > >>> > >>> Thoughts? > >> > >> If there is not much traffic on trac, we could also add that list to the > >> default CC: list of new bugs. bugzilla.redhat.com is also fine with me. > > > > Never really liked trac so moving to bugzilla would be nice. > > > > Talking of which, I never understood why libosinfo lives on > > fedorahosted. Could we maybe move it to libvirt, freedesktop.org, > > gitorious or any other non-distro-specific infra? Any thoughts on > > this? > > > > libvirt.org would be a bit strange since libosinfo isn't libvirt specific, and > ideally long term other projects like say cobbler would pick up libosinfo so > it may not even be virt specific. > > gitorious could work, but then if no one watches for pull requests it's just > another place where contributions could be lost. You can turn off pull request feature I believe. > freedesktop would be cool, though no idea what the criteria is for getting a > project hosted there. I'd avoid freedesktop - whenever I've tried to do anything there it takes weeks->months for the admins to deal with it, if at all. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
