The libosinfo bug tracker seems to be entirely ignored, doesn't look like any bug that's ever been filed has had a response: https://fedorahosted.org/libosinfo/report/8 There's at least 3 patches in there as well. I assume this is mostly due to trac being really easy to ignore, and default assignee + cc list not setup. How do people feel about moving the bug tracker to bugzilla.redhat.com product=Virtualization Tools, which is what libvirt*, libguestfs, and virt-manager use. If so the process would be: - request the component with bugzilla-requests@xxxxxxxxxx. they will need default assignee and cc list at least. - change libosinfo.org to point to the bugzilla instance rather than trac - once that's done, transfer over all the trac bugs, though I suspect many of them are obsolete. - send a request to fedora infrastructure to disable the trac bug tracker for https://fedorahosted.org/libosinfo/ (in fact, they can probably disable this page entirely, it's redundant since there's already libosinfo.org) Thoughts? - Cole _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
